The Obverse

Home › Nickels › Nickel before the Buffalo design

Nickel before the Buffalo design

The Mint's nickel page names the Buffalo design from 1913 on but not the design before it, so we don't either.

What our records show

“From 1913 to 1938, the Mint produced the iconic “Buffalo” nickel, designed by James Earle Fraser.”

Metal, weight and size, where a Mint table dates it

Specifications by coin year, from dated Mint tables
Coin yearsSpecification and source
1900–1912

Metal: 75% copper, 25% nickel · Weight: 5.00 g (our conversion from the Mint's standard weight of 77.16 grains)

Source: U.S. Mint, Domestic and Foreign Coins Manufactured by Mints of the United States, 1792-1965, PDF p. 13 (printed p. 9), table C6: 77.16 grains. Covers the standard weight and composition in the Mint's minor-coinage table, which lists coinage to Dec. 31, 1965 (pamphlet table C6).

Each row covers only the coin years its source establishes. Proof and collector versions can differ and aren't covered.

How many were made

Nickel before the Buffalo design: coins by year and facility
YearPhiladelphia
no mint mark
Denver
D
San Francisco
S
What the figure counts, and notesSource (see list below)
190027,255,995none in this row's coveragenone in this row's coveragestruck that calendar year (includes proofs)
– : the Mint's coinage record shows none struck at that facility that year.
1
190126,480,213none in this row's coveragenone in this row's coveragestruck that calendar year (includes proofs)
– : the Mint's coinage record shows none struck at that facility that year.
1
190231,480,579none in this row's coveragenone in this row's coveragestruck that calendar year (includes proofs)
– : the Mint's coinage record shows none struck at that facility that year.
1
190328,006,725none in this row's coveragenone in this row's coveragestruck that calendar year (includes proofs)
– : the Mint's coinage record shows none struck at that facility that year.
1
190421,404,984none in this row's coveragenone in this row's coveragestruck that calendar year (includes proofs)
– : the Mint's coinage record shows none struck at that facility that year.
1
190529,827,276none in this row's coveragenone in this row's coveragestruck that calendar year (includes proofs)
– : the Mint's coinage record shows none struck at that facility that year.
1
190638,613,725none in this row's coveragenone in this row's coveragestruck that calendar year (includes proofs)
– : the Mint's coinage record shows none struck at that facility that year.
1
190739,214,800none in this row's coveragenone in this row's coveragestruck that calendar year (includes proofs)
– : the Mint's coinage record shows none struck at that facility that year.
1
190822,686,177none in this row's coveragenone in this row's coveragestruck that calendar year (includes proofs)
– : the Mint's coinage record shows none struck at that facility that year.
1
190911,590,526none in this row's coveragenone in this row's coveragestruck that calendar year (includes proofs)
– : the Mint's coinage record shows none struck at that facility that year.
1
191030,169,353none in this row's coveragenone in this row's coveragestruck that calendar year (includes proofs)
– : the Mint's coinage record shows none struck at that facility that year.
1
191139,559,372none in this row's coveragenone in this row's coveragestruck that calendar year (includes proofs)
– : the Mint's coinage record shows none struck at that facility that year.
1
191226,236,7148,474,000238,000struck that calendar year (includes proofs)1, 2, 3
  1. Mint pamphlet 1792-1965, PDF pp. 48 and 50 (printed pp. 44 and 46), table C21
  2. Mint pamphlet 1792-1965, PDF p. 56 (printed p. 52), table C29
  3. Mint pamphlet 1792-1965, PDF p. 63 (printed p. 59), table C35

Where the mint mark is

The Mint pages we used don't say where this design carries its mint mark, so we don't give a location.

Sources

Figures and quotes checked against their sources on October 12, 2026.